Think through this thought with me. I believe there is an
error that is being taught in most of our churches today. Sunday School
teachers teach it. I guess some pastors preach it. People repeat it in
theological discussions, post it on Facebook and build other teachings around
it. You’ve heard it said a thousand times: ALL SIN IS THE SAME TO GOD.
The problem with that statement is that it is patently false
and stands in contradiction to any honest reading of Scripture. There is
absolutely no way a person can read through the Bible and come to the
conclusion that God can’t tell the difference between one sin or another or
that God is equally offended by every sin or that His response to every type of
sin will be the same. Another untruth that derives from this false premise is that
all sin should be treated the same by people or the church. The whole of
Scripture contradicts these ideas, and so do many specific verses as I will
demonstrate shortly.
But first, we must ask from whence this idea came? As far as I can tell, this idea came mostly
from a desire among church members not to be judgmental, which, of course, is a
good desire in and of itself. In fact, these days we’d rather be wrong than
judgmental. I’ll write a future blog on the common misinterpretation of what it
means to be judgmental, as that is a related but different discussion. Back to
the point, we simply don’t want to say one sin is worse than another. We want
to equate all sins, because that ensures that we cannot deem someone else’s sin
to be worse than ours. Again, this comes from a good heart. The problem is that
the idea that no sin is worse than any other sin is simply not true.
But surely, since
we’re talking about Pastors and Sunday School teachers teaching this idea, it
must have come from somewhere in the Bible, right? Well, sort of. There are portions of “The
Sermon on the Mount,” where Jesus indicates that the less obvious sin, such as
lust, makes one just as guilty as the more obvious sin, such as adultery. He
says the same of hatred and murder, etc. However His point is that both the
obvious and less-than obvious are sinful and either will equally make one
guilty. His point is not that both sins
are exactly the same to God. Similarly, James
says “For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles in one point, he
has become guilty of all” (2:10.) The
point of these teachings is the same. We have all sinned. Sin of all types
makes us guilty before God… guilty enough to face judgment and Hell. So, in the
sense of making us guilty before a Holy God, yes, any and all sin does that.
However, neither James nor Jesus came close to teaching that all sin is exactly
the same or that all sin is the same according to God. Big difference.
And so someone asks: How does the Bible refute the
statement, “All sin is the same to God?”
That’s a funny question. The Bible doesn’t need to refute it, because
the Bible doesn’t say it in the first place. However, does anyone really believe
Sodom and Gomorrah would have been burned to the ground because the people
broke the speed limit or because most of them made copies of CD’s? Does anyone really believe that a perfectly just
God sees the sins of Hitler exactly the same as the sins of whatever godly spiritual
leader you respect? Is a lie or gossip
really exactly the same as mass murder to God?
Come now.
So what does the Bible say?
Well, Jesus told Pilate (John 19:11) that the sins of the Jews were
GREATER than his sin, because they should have known better. This alone refutes
the idea that one sin is not greater than another. The Apostle Paul said there
were certain sins that should lead to a person’s dismissal from a church body
(1 Cor. 5, etc.) Christ indicated this as well in his letters to the churches
(Revelation 2-3). Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is certainly singled out as
“worse” than other sin in Matthew 12:31. In Luke 12, Jesus even seems to suggest
that there may be differing degrees of punishment depending on the nature of
the sin. In Matthew 23 and Luke 20, Jesus calls out the sins of certain
religious leaders as “worthy of greater condemnation” than the sins of others. Also
in Matthew 23, Jesus talked about “the weightier things of the Law,” perhaps
indicating some laws (rules) may be more important than others, heaven forbid
(See Leviticus.) Matthew 6 and 18 call
out “un-forgiveness” as a particularly heinous sin. And, in fact, certain sins are
consistently spoken of as being exceptionally offensive to God throughout the
Bible. There can be little doubt that sexual immorality and idolatry are
portrayed as particularly offensive to God. In short, no honest reading of the Bible
could possibly leave one thinking that all sin is the same to God. No way.
As Jesus said in Luke 7:47, “He who has been forgiven little,
loves little.” Let us not rob future
believers of a powerful testimony by telling them there is nothing exceptional
for which they need to be forgiven, when, in fact, their sin might be
exceptional. Paul said, because of His previous murderous actions, “I am the
chief of sinners.” I guess he assumed
that tracking down Christ-followers and having them killed was a particularly
bad kind of sin before a Holy God. It sure felt like a worse kind of sin to
Steven, don’t you think? Yes, Paul was
forgiven more than some. That’s why he
also loved more than some.
Let’s get practical. What am I really doing when I say that committing
homosexual acts (for instance) is no more offensive to God than a momentary prideful
thought? What I am doing is watering
down the sin of same-sex intercourse, and forgetting all that the Bible says
about it. Don’t misunderstand. Pride is certainly evil, sinful and worthy of
damnation to God, but we don’t normally elevate our sin of pride to the level
of sexual immorality in this argument. We simply can’t pull that off. Rather,
we lower our view of sexual immorality until we can view a lifestyle God called
“an abomination” as “not really that bad.”
This is exactly what is happening. Watering down sin is the end game of
our wrong thinking here. When we say “All sin is the same to God,” what winds
up happening is that we basically throw up our hands and say, “Oh well, I might
as well do whatever I want, because I’m going to do something wrong, and anything I do that is wrong is just as bad as
anything else, so I might as well just do what I want.” We also stop acting as salt and light in a
dark and tasteless world, because now we are all dark and tasteless. It’s all
the same. There is no purity. There is now, no “straight and narrow.” There are only shades of gray, and we are all
gray. There is no ability to walk with God, because we all have a sinful
thought or a slip of the tongue now and then, and now that is just as bad as
shacking up with a golden retriever. Forgive my bluntness, because it is
designed to drive home the point in a way that can’t be ignored. The idea that God
sees all sin the same is simply not reasonable.
God killed Ananias and Sapphira for sin. He wiped out Sodom
and Gomorrah for sin. He didn’t wipe out every city nor did He kill every
church member, yet we know that every city and every member of the church had
sin. Clearly, some sin is more dangerous before a Holy God.
So, am I saying we should go around telling people their sin
is worse than ours or come up with lists of those sins that are particularly
bad? No. I’m not saying that at all. There
is another discussion to be had about what the world SHOULD hear us saying and
what they should NOT hear us saying. Our primary job is not to judge their sin.
In the scope of this blog, all I am pointing out is that we need to stop saying
“It’s all the same to God,” because that is a lie from Satan with pervasive
consequences for our churches and our culture.
All sin is damning. That much is true. Only by the blood of
Christ are any of us saved and no one is “too bad” for salvation in Christ. The
issue at salvation is not “how bad is your sin,” but “how great was His
sacrifice?” We are saved by grace
through faith, and not of works (Eph. 2:8). No one is good enough and no one is
beyond hope (See all the “whosoever’s.”)
All of that is true. But be careful, brothers and sisters. When the
world hears us saying “All sin is the same to God,” we may think they will
appreciate our “tolerance.” However, all
they are really hearing is that we worship an unjust God who doesn’t make any moral
sense. Worse, they are not hearing about the God of the Bible. Perhaps we need
to choose our words more carefully, when we are talking about our God. And that’s
a thought to think through.
When the church as a whole or individuals as a group in the church can view all sin as the same it can and does seriously hamper and abate the body of believers. Church discipline is unvoiced and the pathway has so little conflict because we are all the same in our sin, yes we all sin but we do not all sin the same. “For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God”. Sin requires repentance and therefore repentance affords restoration. Lev 19:2, since God is Holy we, Christians, are to be holy. Discipline is not a negative objective, Heb.12:6&7, Christians want to love and be loved but we are called first to be Holy love follows. Only I don’t see this “sin is sin” comes from a good heart, it comes from a lazy heart.
ReplyDeleteHolman Bible Dictionary
“The Great Commission places the responsibility for discipline of disciples in the hands of the church. The believers are to teach them “to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you” (Matt. 28:20). “To observe” is much more than simple knowledge. Observance is to live in obedience to the commands of Jesus. Learning and doing what Jesus wants requires a process, a discipline. Becoming like Christ is the result of the discipline of the Lord Jesus Christ, exercised in and through His church. Hence, churches throughout their history have sought to teach their members the way of the Lord through “church discipline.”
Thank you Pastor mark for addressing this issue. I have come across this same way of thinking among my Christian friends and have tried to explain how I felt about
ReplyDeleteit and how the Bible addressed it. You have explained it so much better. Thank you!
Shirley Black
Interestingly enough, I was re-reading some of C.S. Lewis's Mere Christianity this morning in preparation for Bible study, and he makes the same claim. In fact, he claims that there is one sin that makes "unchastity, anger, greed, drunkenness" and others "mere fleabites in comparison". The sin he terms "The Great Sin" is pride.
ReplyDeleteAmong the more powerful comments about pride that he makes are these, which I find accurate:
* "It was through Pride that the devil became the devil"
* "Pride leads to every other vice; it is the complete anti-God state of mind,"
* "There is no fault which makes a man more unpopular, and no fault which we are more unconscious of in ourselves."
* "Pride has been the chief cause of misery in every nation and every family since the world began. Other vices may sometimes bring people together: you may find good fellowship and jokes and friendliness among drunken people or unchaste people. But pride always means enmity - it is enmity. And not only enmity between man and man, but enmity to God."
I think his most powerful point comes when he tells how pride is the absolute separator of people from God, in that the prideful person cannot or will not understand that he or she is immeasurably inferior to God. The prideful "Christian" is one who, rather than bowing to the holy God, spends time imagining how much God approves of all s/he is doing.
Pride is the antithesis of humility, and humility is a defining virtue of Jesus.
I think the ultimate point, both in what you and Lewis are saying, is that Satan marginalizes the inherent truth of both God's pureness and the Bible by convincing people to accept the notion that their sin(s) is no worse than that of anyone else, despite what they are doing.
When we begin the process of equating all sin, then the people we are attempting reach get a very watered-down version of Truth.
Had I realized I had Lewis on my side, I should have been more confident! ;-)
Delete